Yes. Subscription hiring models like RaaS eliminate unpredictable agency fees and replace them with a single, fixed cost that scales with your business. This gives Talent leaders more control, protects budgets, and enables consistent hiring without waiting for approvals.
SaaS companies rely on speed, but traditional agencies profit from unpredictability.
As salaries rise and competition increases, agencies have quietly increased their fees — often to 20 to 30 percent of base salary.
This creates:
budget volatility
misaligned incentives
cost-per-hire unpredictability
reactive spending
CFO frustration
hiring freezes triggered by cost rather than need
A single AE hire at 100k base now costs up to 30k in fees.
Multiply that across GTM teams and agency spend becomes a structural problem.
Subscription models like RaaS turn recruitment spend into a consistent, forecastable cost.
fixed monthly fee
unlimited hiring within agreed scope
no per-hire charges
predictable budgeting for Finance
stronger alignment between Talent and hiring managers
scalable resource capacity
RaaS removes the margin-driven behaviour of agencies and replaces it with a partnership mindset.
CFOs want predictability.
Talent leaders want flexibility.
RaaS satisfies both.
Companies that migrate from agencies to RaaS typically see:
60 to 80 percent reduction in agency spend
consistent delivery regardless of hiring spikes
easier headcount forecasting
fewer approvals slowing hiring
reduced time to hire through always-on sourcing
Predictable hiring is good for everyone — especially in volatile market conditions.
We have seen SaaS companies waste hundreds of thousands on agency fees simply because they lacked a predictable resourcing model.
RaaS puts the power back into the hands of Talent leaders by turning hiring into a stable, scalable subscription service.
See how predictable subscription hiring can be for your business:
https://saiyo.io/raas