Technology Scale-up Hiring
Can a company use several hiring models at once?
The short answer
Yes. Most mature technology companies use several hiring models at the same time. Internal TA may own the function, Embedded Headhunting may support continuous specialist searches, agencies may cover unexpected niche requirements and executive search may handle selected leadership appointments. The important point is to define ownership and avoid duplicated effort.
Running several models at once is normal and, at scale-up volumes, usually preferable to forcing every role through one provider. The risk is not the number of models but the absence of rules for how they interact.
Create clear role-routing rules
Define, in advance, which categories of role go to which model. Continuous specialist roles to embedded headhunting, occasional niche vacancies to specific agencies, board and CEO-level appointments to executive search, everything else to internal TA. Written routing rules prevent duplicated work and confused ownership.
Use one source of truth in the ATS
Every candidate, from every model, should live in a single ATS with a consistent status flow. Without this, the same candidate is approached twice, feedback is lost between recruiters and reporting becomes unreliable. The ATS is the operating system that lets multiple models coexist.
Protect employer messaging
Candidates rarely notice which model reached them, but they notice inconsistency. Positioning, tone and interview experience should feel like one company regardless of who ran the search. That means shared messaging assets and a single briefing standard across all external partners.
Measure each model against its intended outcome
Compare each model against the problem it was chosen to solve, not against a shared benchmark that suits none of them. Embedded headhunting should be judged on quality and continuity of senior specialist hires, RPO on cost and throughput, executive search on the calibre and fit of individual appointments.
What this means in practice
Use multiple models when their responsibilities are explicit and the candidate experience remains coordinated. Review the portfolio annually and re-route roles when the hiring pattern, market or business priorities change.
The Saiyō view
A well-designed portfolio outperforms a single provider because each model does the work it is built for. The hiring team's job is to be the operating system: setting the routing rules, owning the standard and making sure the models add up to something coherent from a candidate's perspective.
Explored in depth
This topic is explored in more depth within Choosing a Hiring Model for a Technology Scale-up.
Frequently asked questions
See this in practice
Move from the concept to the way Saiyō delivers it.
Related questions
Which hiring model is best for a technology scale-up?
There is no single best hiring model for every scale-up. The correct choice depends on whether hiring is occasional or continuous, whether the talent is accessible, how much operational integration is required and how predictable costs need to be. Most scale-ups benefit from internal ownership supported by a mix of embedded headhunting, selective agencies and executive search.
Read the answerAnswerAgency, RPO or internal TA: how do you choose?
Choose internal TA when the company needs long-term ownership and recurring recruitment capability, agencies when specialist hiring is occasional, and RPO when operational scale and standardisation are the main challenge. Embedded Headhunting fits where continuous specialist hiring requires both proactive market search and integration. The decision should be based on the problem, not on which provider category is most familiar.
Read the answerAnswerWhen should executive search be used?
Executive search should be used when a senior appointment requires confidential market coverage, board-level stakeholder management, leadership assessment or advisory work beyond candidate introduction. It is particularly suitable for chief executive, board and selected C-suite roles. Recurring specialist leadership hiring may be better served by an embedded headhunting model using similar search discipline over a longer period.
Read the answerRelated guides
Recruitment Agencies at Scale: Where the Model Works and Breaks
Recruitment agencies remain effective for occasional specialist hiring but weaken as the primary model when hiring becomes continuous and structural.
Read the guideAuthority GuideRPO for Technology Scale-ups: Strengths, Limits and Alternatives
Traditional RPO excels at standardised operations at enterprise scale. Most technology scale-ups have a different problem: specialist market access.
Read the guide