Use case
High-volume hiring sprints
Last reviewed:
The short answer
A raise, a new product line or a flagship customer win can create a sudden, time-boxed hiring spike your in-house team cannot absorb. CVaaS plugs a senior sourcing team into your funnel for a fixed sprint: curated, headhunted CVs delivered into your ATS within 48 hours of spin-up, on a fixed price with no placement fees, and an average cost-per-hire reduction of more than 80% against agency spend.
The situation
You have closed a Series C, opened a new product line, or won a customer that contractually requires a delivery team. The hiring plan jumps from two roles a quarter to fifteen, and your in-house TA team is already at capacity. The spike is real but temporary, so hiring permanent recruiters to cover it does not make sense.
The traditional answer is a panel of contingency agencies. The result is duplicated CVs, inconsistent briefs, unvetted volume, and fees that punish you for the success of the sprint.
How Saiyō approaches it
- CVaaS spins up within 48 hours: a senior sourcing team calibrated on your roles, your bar and your pitch.
- Candidates are headhunted, not scraped from job boards. Every CV is curated and qualified before it reaches your ATS.
- Delivery is project-based at a fixed price. No placement fees, so the tenth hire costs the same as the first.
- Your recruiters keep running the process; we flood the top of the funnel with people they could not otherwise reach.
What it looks like in practice
CVaaS clients see an 80%+ average reduction in cost per hire against agency spend, because the model prices the work rather than the outcome. It is deliberately complementary to your in-house team: they keep ownership of interviews, offers and candidate experience, while the sourcing engine runs behind them.
When this is not the right answer
- If the hiring need is ongoing rather than a spike, RaaS is the better fit: an embedded headhunter on subscription will outperform repeated sprints.
- If the roles are VP or C-suite, volume sourcing is the wrong tool. Those belong in a retained Executive Search.
- If you do not have anyone to run interviews and offers, sourcing alone will not fix it. You need embedded delivery, not just pipeline.