- Home
- Alternatives
Alternatives
Looking for an alternative to your embedded recruitment partner?
Last reviewed:
The short answer
Most embedded recruitment partners add recruiting capacity. That fixes a bandwidth problem. It does not fix an access problem, where the people you want to hire are not applying and are not answering messages. These guides set out the main alternatives to the best-known providers, what each is good at, and when each one is the right call.
Alternatives guides
Talentful alternatives
For teams comparing large embedded RPO providers with headhunting-led and specialist options.
ReadTroi alternatives
For teams weighing embedded RPO models against embedded headhunting.
ReadMove recruitment alternatives
For teams comparing embedded talent consultancies with headhunter-led embedded models.
ReadCompare by model
Embedded recruiter vs embedded headhunter
ReadSaiyō vs traditional executive search firms
ReadSaiyō vs contract recruiters
ReadSaiyō vs RPO, Agency and In-house
ReadThe one question that decides it
Before you compare providers, decide which problem you have.
A capacity problem looks like this: plenty of decent candidates, not enough recruiter hours to process them. Interviews slip, candidates go cold, hiring managers chase. More recruiters solve it.
An access problem looks like this: the process runs fine, but the shortlist is thin, the best people in the market never appear in it, and senior roles stay open for months. More recruiters do not solve it. They run the same process faster.
Most providers in this market are built for the first problem. Saiyō is built for the second.